------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: Environment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO_DEPENDS=1 UNAME_r=6.5 UNAME_m=x86_64 UNAME_p=x86_64 UNAME_v=unknown UNAME_s=DragonFly PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin SSL_NO_VERIFY_PEER=1 LANG=C HOME=/root USER=root TERM=dumb SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: showconfig ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: CONFIGURE_ENV ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- XDG_DATA_HOME=/construction/mail/libspamtest XDG_CONFIG_HOME=/construction/mail/libspamtest XDG_CACHE_HOME=/construction/mail/libspamtest/.cache HOME=/construction/mail/libspamtest TMPDIR="/tmp" PATH=/construction/mail/libspamtest/.bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR=/construction/mail/libspamtest/.pkgconfig:/usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig:/usr/local/share/pkgconfig:/usr/libdata/pkgconfig SHELL=/bin/sh CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/sh CCVER=gcc80 SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: CONFIGURE_ARGS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: MAKE_ENV ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- XDG_DATA_HOME=/construction/mail/libspamtest XDG_CONFIG_HOME=/construction/mail/libspamtest XDG_CACHE_HOME=/construction/mail/libspamtest/.cache HOME=/construction/mail/libspamtest TMPDIR="/tmp" PATH=/construction/mail/libspamtest/.bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR=/construction/mail/libspamtest/.pkgconfig:/usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig:/usr/local/share/pkgconfig:/usr/libdata/pkgconfig MK_DEBUG_FILES=no MK_KERNEL_SYMBOLS=no SHELL=/bin/sh NO_LINT=YES CCVER=gcc80 PREFIX=/usr/local LOCALBASE=/usr/local NOPROFILE=1 CC="cc" CFLAGS="-pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing " CPP="cpp" CPPFLAGS="" LDFLAGS=" " LIBS="libspamtest.a libspamtest_r.a" CXX="c++" CXXFLAGS=" -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing " MANPREFIX="/usr/local" BSD_INSTALL_PROGRAM="install -s -m 555" BSD_INSTALL_LIB="install -s -m 0644" BSD_INSTALL_SCRIPT="install -m 555" BSD_INSTALL_DATA="install -m 0644" BSD_INSTALL_MAN="install -m 444" SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: MAKE_ARGS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESTDIR=/construction/mail/libspamtest/stage SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: PLIST_SUB ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OSREL=6.5 PREFIX=%D LOCALBASE=/usr/local RESETPREFIX=/usr/local LIB32DIR=lib PROFILE="@comment " DOCSDIR="share/doc/libspamtest" EXAMPLESDIR="share/examples/libspamtest" DATADIR="share/libspamtest" WWWDIR="www/libspamtest" ETCDIR="etc/libspamtest" SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: SUB_LIST ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PREFIX=/usr/local LOCALBASE=/usr/local DATADIR=/usr/local/share/libspamtest DOCSDIR=/usr/local/share/doc/libspamtest EXAMPLESDIR=/usr/local/share/examples/libspamtest WWWDIR=/usr/local/www/libspamtest ETCDIR=/usr/local/etc/libspamtest SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: /etc/make.conf ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DPORTS_BUILDER=yes DISABLE_LICENSES=yes DEFAULT_VERSIONS=ssl=openssl FORCE_PACKAGE=yes DEVELOPER=yes DFLY_STING_XFAIL=yes USE_PACKAGE_DEPENDS_ONLY=yes PORTSDIR=/xports PORT_DBDIR=/options PKG_DBDIR=/var/db/pkg PKG_CACHEDIR=/var/cache/pkg PKG_COMPRESSION_FORMAT=.tgz DEVELOPER=1 WITH_CCACHE_BUILD=yes CCACHE_DIR=/ccache UID=0 ARCH=x86_64 OPSYS=DragonFly DFLYVERSION=600503 OSVERSION=9999999 OSREL=6.5 _OSRELEASE=6.5-SYNTH DISTDIR=/distfiles WRKDIRPREFIX=/construction BATCH=yes PACKAGE_BUILDING=yes PKG_CREATE_VERBOSE=yes MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=13 SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: setup ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Installing /packages/All/ccache-3.7.12_4.pkg Create compiler links... create symlink for cc create symlink for cc (world) create symlink for c++ create symlink for c++ (world) create symlink for CC create symlink for CC (world) create symlink for gcc create symlink for gcc (world) create symlink for g++ create symlink for g++ (world) ===== Message from ccache-3.7.12_4: -- NOTE: Please read /usr/local/share/doc/ccache/ccache-howto-freebsd.txt for information on using ccache with FreeBSD ports and src. SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: check-sanity ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===> NOTICE: The libspamtest port currently does not have a maintainer. As a result, it is more likely to have unresolved issues, not be up-to-date, or even be removed in the future. To volunteer to maintain this port, please create an issue at: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla More information about port maintainership is available at: https://docs.freebsd.org/en/articles/contributing/#ports-contributing SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: pkg-depends ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===> libspamtest-20080808 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: fetch-depends ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: fetch ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===> NOTICE: The libspamtest port currently does not have a maintainer. As a result, it is more likely to have unresolved issues, not be up-to-date, or even be removed in the future. To volunteer to maintain this port, please create an issue at: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla More information about port maintainership is available at: https://docs.freebsd.org/en/articles/contributing/#ports-contributing ===> libspamtest-20080808 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by libspamtest-20080808 for building SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: checksum ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===> NOTICE: The libspamtest port currently does not have a maintainer. As a result, it is more likely to have unresolved issues, not be up-to-date, or even be removed in the future. To volunteer to maintain this port, please create an issue at: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla More information about port maintainership is available at: https://docs.freebsd.org/en/articles/contributing/#ports-contributing ===> libspamtest-20080808 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by libspamtest-20080808 for building => SHA256 Checksum OK for libspamtest-20080808.tar.gz. SUCCEEDED 00:00:01 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: extract-depends ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: extract ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===> NOTICE: The libspamtest port currently does not have a maintainer. As a result, it is more likely to have unresolved issues, not be up-to-date, or even be removed in the future. To volunteer to maintain this port, please create an issue at: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla More information about port maintainership is available at: https://docs.freebsd.org/en/articles/contributing/#ports-contributing ===> libspamtest-20080808 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by libspamtest-20080808 for building ===> Extracting for libspamtest-20080808 => SHA256 Checksum OK for libspamtest-20080808.tar.gz. Extracted Memory Use: 2.69M SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: patch-depends ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: patch ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===> Patching for libspamtest-20080808 ===> Applying ports patches for libspamtest-20080808 from /xports/mail/libspamtest/files SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: build-depends ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===> libspamtest-20080808 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/ccache - found SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: lib-depends ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: configure ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===> libspamtest-20080808 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/ccache - found ===> Configuring for libspamtest-20080808 SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: build ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===> Building for libspamtest-20080808 --- msgstore.or --- --- spamtest_util.or --- --- heap.or --- --- spamtest.or --- --- bufio.or --- --- record2.or --- --- mess822.or --- --- addrlist.or --- --- msgstore.So --- --- spamtest_util.So --- --- heap.So --- --- spamtest.So --- --- bufio.So --- --- msgstore.or --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -D_REENTRANT -DXP_MT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c msgstore.c -o msgstore.or --- spamtest_util.or --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -D_REENTRANT -DXP_MT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c spamtest_util.c -o spamtest_util.or --- heap.or --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -D_REENTRANT -DXP_MT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c heap.c -o heap.or --- spamtest.or --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -D_REENTRANT -DXP_MT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c spamtest.c -o spamtest.or --- bufio.or --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -D_REENTRANT -DXP_MT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c bufio.c -o bufio.or --- record2.or --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -D_REENTRANT -DXP_MT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c record2.c -o record2.or --- mess822.or --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -D_REENTRANT -DXP_MT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c mess822.c -o mess822.or --- addrlist.or --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -D_REENTRANT -DXP_MT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c addrlist.c -o addrlist.or --- msgstore.So --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -c msgstore.c -o msgstore.So --- spamtest_util.So --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -c spamtest_util.c -o spamtest_util.So --- heap.So --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -c heap.c -o heap.So --- bufio.So --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -c bufio.c -o bufio.So --- spamtest.So --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -c spamtest.c -o spamtest.So --- spamtest_util.or --- spamtest_util.c: In function 'glue_actions': spamtest_util.c:309:6: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if(ms->rcpts) ^~ spamtest_util.c:312:10: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' for(j=0;jaction_count;j++) ^~~ --- mess822.or --- mess822.c: In function 'byte_chr': mess822.c:509:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:509:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:510:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:510:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:511:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:511:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:512:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:512:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c: In function 'byte_rchr': mess822.c:531:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:531:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:532:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:532:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:533:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:533:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:534:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:534:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c: In function 'byte_copy': mess822.c:545:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:545:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c:546:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:546:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c:547:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:547:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c:548:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:548:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c: In function 'byte_copyr': mess822.c:560:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:560:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c:561:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:561:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c:562:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:562:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c:563:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:563:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c: In function 'str_chr': mess822.c:577:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:577:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:578:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:578:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:579:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:579:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:580:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:580:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c: In function 'str_rchr': mess822.c:597:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:597:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:598:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:598:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:599:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:599:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:600:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:600:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ --- record2.or --- record2.c: In function 'rec_get': record2.c:139:10: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'unsigned char *' to 'char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] bufp = buf; ^ --- record2.So --- --- mess822.So --- --- addrlist.So --- --- msgstore.Sr --- --- spamtest_util.Sr --- --- heap.Sr --- --- spamtest.Sr --- --- bufio.Sr --- --- spamtest.So --- spamtest.c: In function 'read_attribute': spamtest.c:595:24: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'check_string' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(st->attr_buf, st->rb_ptr); ~~^~~~~~~~~~ spamtest.c:545:14: note: expected 'char *' but argument is of type 'unsigned char *' static char *check_string(char *ptr,int len) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ spamtest.c:595:7: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'char *' to 'unsigned char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(st->attr_buf, st->rb_ptr); ^ spamtest.c:601:11: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'unsigned char *' to 'char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] *aval = p + 1; ^ spamtest.c:603:38: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'strlen' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] st->rb_ptr, strlen(st->attr_buf) + 1, ~~^~~~~~~~~~ In file included from spamtest.c:15: --- record2.So --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -c record2.c -o record2.So --- mess822.So --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -c mess822.c -o mess822.So --- addrlist.So --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -c addrlist.c -o addrlist.So --- msgstore.Sr --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -DXP_MT -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c msgstore.c -o msgstore.Sr --- spamtest_util.Sr --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -DXP_MT -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c spamtest_util.c -o spamtest_util.Sr --- record2.Sr --- --- mess822.Sr --- --- bufio.Sr --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -DXP_MT -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c bufio.c -o bufio.Sr --- spamtest.So --- /usr/include/string.h:110:9: note: expected 'const char *' but argument is of type 'unsigned char *' size_t strlen(const char *) __pure; ^~~~~~ spamtest.c:605:24: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'check_string' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(p + 1, st->rb_ptr - (p + 1 - st->attr_buf)); ~~^~~ spamtest.c:545:14: note: expected 'char *' but argument is of type 'unsigned char *' static char *check_string(char *ptr,int len) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ spamtest.c:605:7: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'char *' to 'unsigned char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(p + 1, st->rb_ptr - (p + 1 - st->attr_buf)); ^ spamtest.c:612:12: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'unsigned char *' to 'char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] *aname = st->attr_buf; ^ spamtest.c: In function 'read_processed_messages': --- spamtest.Sr --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -DXP_MT -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c spamtest.c -o spamtest.Sr --- heap.Sr --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -DXP_MT -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c heap.c -o heap.Sr --- spamtest.So --- spamtest.c:1199:48: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'rec_get' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] while ((count > 0) && ((type = rec_get(s, s->record_buf, MAX_RECORD_LEN, &gotln)) > 0) ) ~^~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from spamtest.c:76: record2.h:13:9: note: expected 'unsigned char *' but argument is of type 'char *' int rec_get(spamtest_session_t *s, unsigned char *buf, int maxsize,int *gotlen); ^~~~~~~ --- record2.Sr --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -DXP_MT -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c record2.c -o record2.Sr --- mess822.Sr --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -DXP_MT -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c mess822.c -o mess822.Sr --- addrlist.Sr --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -DXP_MT -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c addrlist.c -o addrlist.Sr --- record2.Sr --- record2.c: In function 'rec_get': record2.c:139:10: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'unsigned char *' to 'char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] bufp = buf; ^ --- mess822.Sr --- mess822.c: In function 'byte_chr': mess822.c:509:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:509:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:510:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:510:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:511:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:511:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:512:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:512:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c: In function 'byte_rchr': mess822.c:531:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:531:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:532:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ --- msgstore.o --- --- mess822.Sr --- mess822.c:532:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:533:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:533:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:534:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:534:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c: In function 'byte_copy': mess822.c:545:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] --- spamtest_util.o --- --- mess822.Sr --- if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:545:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c:546:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:546:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c:547:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:547:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c:548:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:548:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c: In function 'byte_copyr': mess822.c:560:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:560:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c:561:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:561:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c:562:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:562:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c:563:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:563:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c: In function 'str_chr': mess822.c:577:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:577:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:578:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:578:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:579:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:579:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:580:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:580:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c: In function 'str_rchr': mess822.c:597:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:597:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:598:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:598:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:599:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:599:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:600:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:600:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ --- msgstore.o --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -c msgstore.c --- mess822.So --- mess822.c: In function 'byte_chr': mess822.c:509:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:509:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:510:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:510:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:511:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:511:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:512:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:512:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c: In function 'byte_rchr': mess822.c:531:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:531:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:532:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:532:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:533:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:533:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:534:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:534:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c: In function 'byte_copy': mess822.c:545:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:545:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c:546:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:546:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c:547:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:547:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c:548:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:548:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c: In function 'byte_copyr': mess822.c:560:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:560:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c:561:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:561:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c:562:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:562:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c:563:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:563:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c: In function 'str_chr': mess822.c:577:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:577:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:578:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:578:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:579:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:579:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:580:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:580:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c: In function 'str_rchr': mess822.c:597:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:597:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:598:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:598:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:599:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:599:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:600:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:600:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ --- spamtest_util.o --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -c spamtest_util.c spamtest_util.c: In function 'glue_actions': spamtest_util.c:309:6: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if(ms->rcpts) ^~ spamtest_util.c:312:10: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' for(j=0;jaction_count;j++) ^~~ --- spamtest_util.Sr --- spamtest_util.c: In function 'glue_actions': spamtest_util.c:309:6: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if(ms->rcpts) ^~ spamtest_util.c:312:10: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' for(j=0;jaction_count;j++) ^~~ --- record2.So --- record2.c: In function 'rec_get': record2.c:139:10: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'unsigned char *' to 'char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] bufp = buf; ^ --- spamtest.Sr --- spamtest.c: In function 'read_attribute': spamtest.c:595:24: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'check_string' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(st->attr_buf, st->rb_ptr); ~~^~~~~~~~~~ spamtest.c:545:14: note: expected 'char *' but argument is of type 'unsigned char *' static char *check_string(char *ptr,int len) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ spamtest.c:595:7: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'char *' to 'unsigned char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(st->attr_buf, st->rb_ptr); ^ spamtest.c:601:11: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'unsigned char *' to 'char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] *aval = p + 1; ^ spamtest.c:603:38: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'strlen' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] st->rb_ptr, strlen(st->attr_buf) + 1, ~~^~~~~~~~~~ In file included from spamtest.c:15: /usr/include/string.h:110:9: note: expected 'const char *' but argument is of type 'unsigned char *' size_t strlen(const char *) __pure; ^~~~~~ spamtest.c:605:24: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'check_string' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(p + 1, st->rb_ptr - (p + 1 - st->attr_buf)); ~~^~~ spamtest.c:545:14: note: expected 'char *' but argument is of type 'unsigned char *' static char *check_string(char *ptr,int len) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ spamtest.c:605:7: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'char *' to 'unsigned char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(p + 1, st->rb_ptr - (p + 1 - st->attr_buf)); ^ spamtest.c:612:12: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'unsigned char *' to 'char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] *aname = st->attr_buf; ^ spamtest.c: In function 'read_processed_messages': spamtest.c:1199:48: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'rec_get' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] while ((count > 0) && ((type = rec_get(s, s->record_buf, MAX_RECORD_LEN, &gotln)) > 0) ) ~^~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from spamtest.c:76: record2.h:13:9: note: expected 'unsigned char *' but argument is of type 'char *' int rec_get(spamtest_session_t *s, unsigned char *buf, int maxsize,int *gotlen); ^~~~~~~ --- heap.o --- --- spamtest.o --- --- bufio.o --- --- record2.o --- --- mess822.o --- --- addrlist.o --- --- libspamtest_r.so.3 --- --- heap.o --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -c heap.c --- spamtest.o --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -c spamtest.c --- bufio.o --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -c bufio.c --- record2.o --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -c record2.c --- mess822.o --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -c mess822.c --- addrlist.o --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -c addrlist.c --- libspamtest_r.so.3 --- rm -f libspamtest_r.so.3 cc -pthread -shared -Wl,-x -o libspamtest_r.so.3 `lorder msgstore.Sr spamtest_util.Sr heap.Sr spamtest.Sr bufio.Sr record2.Sr mess822.Sr addrlist.Sr | tsort -q` --- mess822.o --- mess822.c: In function 'byte_chr': mess822.c:509:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:509:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:510:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:510:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:511:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:511:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:512:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:512:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c: In function 'byte_rchr': mess822.c:531:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:531:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:532:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ --- spamtest.o --- spamtest.c: In function 'read_attribute': spamtest.c:595:24: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'check_string' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(st->attr_buf, st->rb_ptr); ~~^~~~~~~~~~ spamtest.c:545:14: note: expected 'char *' but argument is of type 'unsigned char *' static char *check_string(char *ptr,int len) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ spamtest.c:595:7: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'char *' to 'unsigned char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(st->attr_buf, st->rb_ptr); ^ spamtest.c:601:11: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'unsigned char *' to 'char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] *aval = p + 1; ^ spamtest.c:603:38: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'strlen' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] st->rb_ptr, strlen(st->attr_buf) + 1, ~~^~~~~~~~~~ In file included from spamtest.c:15: --- mess822.o --- mess822.c:532:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:533:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:533:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:534:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:534:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c: In function 'byte_copy': mess822.c:545:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:545:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c:546:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:546:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c:547:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:547:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c:548:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:548:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c: In function 'byte_copyr': mess822.c:560:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:560:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c:561:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:561:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c:562:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:562:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c:563:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:563:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c: In function 'str_chr': mess822.c:577:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:577:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:578:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:578:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:579:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:579:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:580:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:580:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c: In function 'str_rchr': mess822.c:597:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:597:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:598:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:598:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:599:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:599:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:600:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:600:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ --- record2.o --- record2.c: In function 'rec_get': record2.c:139:10: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'unsigned char *' to 'char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] bufp = buf; ^ --- spamtest.o --- /usr/include/string.h:110:9: note: expected 'const char *' but argument is of type 'unsigned char *' size_t strlen(const char *) __pure; ^~~~~~ spamtest.c:605:24: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'check_string' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(p + 1, st->rb_ptr - (p + 1 - st->attr_buf)); ~~^~~ spamtest.c:545:14: note: expected 'char *' but argument is of type 'unsigned char *' static char *check_string(char *ptr,int len) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ spamtest.c:605:7: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'char *' to 'unsigned char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(p + 1, st->rb_ptr - (p + 1 - st->attr_buf)); ^ spamtest.c:612:12: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'unsigned char *' to 'char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] *aname = st->attr_buf; ^ spamtest.c: In function 'read_processed_messages': spamtest.c:1199:48: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'rec_get' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] while ((count > 0) && ((type = rec_get(s, s->record_buf, MAX_RECORD_LEN, &gotln)) > 0) ) ~^~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from spamtest.c:76: record2.h:13:9: note: expected 'unsigned char *' but argument is of type 'char *' int rec_get(spamtest_session_t *s, unsigned char *buf, int maxsize,int *gotlen); ^~~~~~~ --- libspamtest.a --- rm -f libspamtest.a ar cr libspamtest.a msgstore.o spamtest_util.o heap.o spamtest.o bufio.o record2.o mess822.o addrlist.o ranlib libspamtest.a --- spamtest_util.So --- spamtest_util.c: In function 'glue_actions': spamtest_util.c:309:6: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if(ms->rcpts) ^~ spamtest_util.c:312:10: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' for(j=0;jaction_count;j++) ^~~ --- libspamtest.so.3 --- rm -f libspamtest.so.3 cc -shared -Wl,-x -o libspamtest.so.3 -Wl,-soname,libspamtest.so.3 `lorder msgstore.So spamtest_util.So heap.So spamtest.So bufio.So record2.So mess822.So addrlist.So | tsort -q` --- spamtest.or --- spamtest.c: In function 'read_attribute': spamtest.c:595:24: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'check_string' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(st->attr_buf, st->rb_ptr); ~~^~~~~~~~~~ spamtest.c:545:14: note: expected 'char *' but argument is of type 'unsigned char *' static char *check_string(char *ptr,int len) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ spamtest.c:595:7: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'char *' to 'unsigned char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(st->attr_buf, st->rb_ptr); ^ spamtest.c:601:11: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'unsigned char *' to 'char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] *aval = p + 1; ^ spamtest.c:603:38: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'strlen' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] st->rb_ptr, strlen(st->attr_buf) + 1, ~~^~~~~~~~~~ In file included from spamtest.c:15: /usr/include/string.h:110:9: note: expected 'const char *' but argument is of type 'unsigned char *' size_t strlen(const char *) __pure; ^~~~~~ spamtest.c:605:24: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'check_string' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(p + 1, st->rb_ptr - (p + 1 - st->attr_buf)); ~~^~~ spamtest.c:545:14: note: expected 'char *' but argument is of type 'unsigned char *' static char *check_string(char *ptr,int len) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ spamtest.c:605:7: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'char *' to 'unsigned char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(p + 1, st->rb_ptr - (p + 1 - st->attr_buf)); ^ spamtest.c:612:12: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'unsigned char *' to 'char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] *aname = st->attr_buf; ^ spamtest.c: In function 'read_processed_messages': spamtest.c:1199:48: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'rec_get' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] while ((count > 0) && ((type = rec_get(s, s->record_buf, MAX_RECORD_LEN, &gotln)) > 0) ) ~^~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from spamtest.c:76: record2.h:13:9: note: expected 'unsigned char *' but argument is of type 'char *' int rec_get(spamtest_session_t *s, unsigned char *buf, int maxsize,int *gotlen); ^~~~~~~ --- libspamtest_r.a --- rm -f libspamtest_r.a ar cr libspamtest_r.a msgstore.or spamtest_util.or heap.or spamtest.or bufio.or record2.or mess822.or addrlist.or ranlib libspamtest_r.a SUCCEEDED 00:00:01 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: run-depends ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: stage ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===> Staging for libspamtest-20080808 ===> Generating temporary packing list /bin/mkdir -p /construction/mail/libspamtest/stage/usr/local/ap-mailfilter3/lib /construction/mail/libspamtest/stage/usr/local/ap-mailfilter3/include install -m 0644 /construction/mail/libspamtest/libspamtest/libspamtest.a /construction/mail/libspamtest/libspamtest/libspamtest_r.a /construction/mail/libspamtest/stage/usr/local/ap-mailfilter3/lib install -m 0644 /construction/mail/libspamtest/libspamtest/spamtest.h /construction/mail/libspamtest/libspamtest/msgstore.h /construction/mail/libspamtest/stage/usr/local/ap-mailfilter3/include ====> Compressing man pages (compress-man) ====> Running Q/A tests (stage-qa) Warning: You have disabled the licenses framework with DISABLE_LICENSES, unable to run checks SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: check-plist ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ====> Checking for pkg-plist issues (check-plist) ===> Parsing plist ===> Checking for items in STAGEDIR missing from pkg-plist ===> Checking for items in pkg-plist which are not in STAGEDIR ===> No pkg-plist issues found (check-plist) SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: package ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===> Building package for libspamtest-20080808 file sizes/checksums [4]: 0% file sizes/checksums [4]: 100% Service unavailablepacking files [4]: 0% packing files [4]: 100% packing directories [0]: 0% packing directories [0]: 100% SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 TOTAL TIME 00:00:02