------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: check-sanity ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===> NOTICE: The libspamtest port currently does not have a maintainer. As a result, it is more likely to have unresolved issues, not be up-to-date, or even be removed in the future. To volunteer to maintain this port, please create an issue at: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla More information about port maintainership is available at: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/contributing/ports-contributing.html#maintain-port SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: pkg-depends ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===> libspamtest-20080808 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: fetch-depends ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: fetch ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===> NOTICE: The libspamtest port currently does not have a maintainer. As a result, it is more likely to have unresolved issues, not be up-to-date, or even be removed in the future. To volunteer to maintain this port, please create an issue at: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla More information about port maintainership is available at: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/contributing/ports-contributing.html#maintain-port ===> libspamtest-20080808 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by libspamtest-20080808 for building SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: checksum ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===> NOTICE: The libspamtest port currently does not have a maintainer. As a result, it is more likely to have unresolved issues, not be up-to-date, or even be removed in the future. To volunteer to maintain this port, please create an issue at: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla More information about port maintainership is available at: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/contributing/ports-contributing.html#maintain-port ===> libspamtest-20080808 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by libspamtest-20080808 for building => SHA256 Checksum OK for libspamtest-20080808.tar.gz. SUCCEEDED 00:00:01 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: extract-depends ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: extract ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===> NOTICE: The libspamtest port currently does not have a maintainer. As a result, it is more likely to have unresolved issues, not be up-to-date, or even be removed in the future. To volunteer to maintain this port, please create an issue at: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla More information about port maintainership is available at: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/contributing/ports-contributing.html#maintain-port ===> libspamtest-20080808 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by libspamtest-20080808 for building ===> Extracting for libspamtest-20080808 => SHA256 Checksum OK for libspamtest-20080808.tar.gz. Extracted Memory Use: 2.69M SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: patch-depends ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: patch ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===> Patching for libspamtest-20080808 ===> Applying ports patches for libspamtest-20080808 SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: build-depends ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: lib-depends ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: configure ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===> Configuring for libspamtest-20080808 SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: build ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===> Building for libspamtest-20080808 --- msgstore.or --- --- spamtest_util.or --- --- heap.or --- --- spamtest.or --- --- bufio.or --- --- record2.or --- --- mess822.or --- --- addrlist.or --- --- msgstore.So --- --- spamtest_util.So --- --- msgstore.or --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -D_REENTRANT -DXP_MT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c msgstore.c -o msgstore.or --- spamtest_util.or --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -D_REENTRANT -DXP_MT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c spamtest_util.c -o spamtest_util.or --- heap.or --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -D_REENTRANT -DXP_MT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c heap.c -o heap.or --- spamtest.or --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -D_REENTRANT -DXP_MT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c spamtest.c -o spamtest.or --- bufio.or --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -D_REENTRANT -DXP_MT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c bufio.c -o bufio.or --- record2.or --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -D_REENTRANT -DXP_MT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c record2.c -o record2.or --- addrlist.or --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -D_REENTRANT -DXP_MT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c addrlist.c -o addrlist.or --- mess822.or --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -D_REENTRANT -DXP_MT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c mess822.c -o mess822.or --- msgstore.So --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -c msgstore.c -o msgstore.So --- spamtest_util.So --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -c spamtest_util.c -o spamtest_util.So --- record2.or --- record2.c: In function 'rec_get': record2.c:139:10: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'unsigned char *' to 'char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] bufp = buf; ^ --- mess822.or --- mess822.c: In function 'byte_chr': mess822.c:509:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:509:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:510:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:510:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:511:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:511:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:512:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:512:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c: In function 'byte_rchr': mess822.c:531:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:531:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:532:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:532:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:533:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:533:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:534:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:534:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c: In function 'byte_copy': mess822.c:545:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:545:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c:546:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:546:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c:547:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:547:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c:548:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:548:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c: In function 'byte_copyr': mess822.c:560:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:560:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c:561:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:561:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c:562:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:562:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c:563:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:563:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c: In function 'str_chr': mess822.c:577:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:577:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:578:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:578:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:579:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:579:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:580:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:580:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c: In function 'str_rchr': mess822.c:597:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:597:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:598:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:598:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:599:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:599:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:600:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:600:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ --- spamtest.or --- spamtest.c: In function 'read_attribute': spamtest.c:595:24: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'check_string' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(st->attr_buf, st->rb_ptr); ~~^~~~~~~~~~ spamtest.c:545:14: note: expected 'char *' but argument is of type 'unsigned char *' static char *check_string(char *ptr,int len) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ spamtest.c:595:7: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'char *' to 'unsigned char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(st->attr_buf, st->rb_ptr); ^ spamtest.c:601:11: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'unsigned char *' to 'char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] *aval = p + 1; ^ spamtest.c:603:38: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'strlen' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] st->rb_ptr, strlen(st->attr_buf) + 1, ~~^~~~~~~~~~ In file included from spamtest.c:15: /usr/include/string.h:110:9: note: expected 'const char *' but argument is of type 'unsigned char *' size_t strlen(const char *) __pure; ^~~~~~ spamtest.c:605:24: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'check_string' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(p + 1, st->rb_ptr - (p + 1 - st->attr_buf)); ~~^~~ spamtest.c:545:14: note: expected 'char *' but argument is of type 'unsigned char *' static char *check_string(char *ptr,int len) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ spamtest.c:605:7: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'char *' to 'unsigned char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(p + 1, st->rb_ptr - (p + 1 - st->attr_buf)); ^ spamtest.c:612:12: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'unsigned char *' to 'char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] *aname = st->attr_buf; ^ spamtest.c: In function 'read_processed_messages': spamtest.c:1199:48: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'rec_get' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] while ((count > 0) && ((type = rec_get(s, s->record_buf, MAX_RECORD_LEN, &gotln)) > 0) ) ~^~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from spamtest.c:76: record2.h:13:9: note: expected 'unsigned char *' but argument is of type 'char *' int rec_get(spamtest_session_t *s, unsigned char *buf, int maxsize,int *gotlen); ^~~~~~~ --- spamtest_util.So --- spamtest_util.c: In function 'glue_actions': spamtest_util.c:309:6: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if(ms->rcpts) ^~ spamtest_util.c:312:10: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' for(j=0;jaction_count;j++) ^~~ --- heap.So --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -c heap.c -o heap.So --- spamtest_util.or --- spamtest_util.c: In function 'glue_actions': spamtest_util.c:309:6: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if(ms->rcpts) ^~ spamtest_util.c:312:10: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' for(j=0;jaction_count;j++) ^~~ --- spamtest.So --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -c spamtest.c -o spamtest.So --- bufio.So --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -c bufio.c -o bufio.So --- record2.So --- --- spamtest.So --- spamtest.c: In function 'read_attribute': spamtest.c:595:24: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'check_string' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(st->attr_buf, st->rb_ptr); ~~^~~~~~~~~~ spamtest.c:545:14: note: expected 'char *' but argument is of type 'unsigned char *' static char *check_string(char *ptr,int len) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ spamtest.c:595:7: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'char *' to 'unsigned char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(st->attr_buf, st->rb_ptr); ^ spamtest.c:601:11: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'unsigned char *' to 'char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] *aval = p + 1; ^ spamtest.c:603:38: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'strlen' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] st->rb_ptr, strlen(st->attr_buf) + 1, ~~^~~~~~~~~~ In file included from spamtest.c:15: /usr/include/string.h:110:9: note: expected 'const char *' but argument is of type 'unsigned char *' size_t strlen(const char *) __pure; ^~~~~~ spamtest.c:605:24: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'check_string' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(p + 1, st->rb_ptr - (p + 1 - st->attr_buf)); ~~^~~ spamtest.c:545:14: note: expected 'char *' but argument is of type 'unsigned char *' static char *check_string(char *ptr,int len) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ spamtest.c:605:7: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'char *' to 'unsigned char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(p + 1, st->rb_ptr - (p + 1 - st->attr_buf)); ^ spamtest.c:612:12: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'unsigned char *' to 'char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] *aname = st->attr_buf; ^ --- record2.So --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -c record2.c -o record2.So --- spamtest.So --- spamtest.c: In function 'read_processed_messages': spamtest.c:1199:48: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'rec_get' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] while ((count > 0) && ((type = rec_get(s, s->record_buf, MAX_RECORD_LEN, &gotln)) > 0) ) ~^~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from spamtest.c:76: record2.h:13:9: note: expected 'unsigned char *' but argument is of type 'char *' int rec_get(spamtest_session_t *s, unsigned char *buf, int maxsize,int *gotlen); ^~~~~~~ --- record2.So --- record2.c: In function 'rec_get': record2.c:139:10: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'unsigned char *' to 'char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] bufp = buf; ^ --- mess822.So --- --- addrlist.So --- --- mess822.So --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -c mess822.c -o mess822.So --- addrlist.So --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -c addrlist.c -o addrlist.So --- mess822.So --- mess822.c: In function 'byte_chr': mess822.c:509:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:509:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:510:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:510:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:511:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:511:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:512:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:512:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c: In function 'byte_rchr': mess822.c:531:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:531:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:532:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:532:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:533:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:533:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:534:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:534:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c: In function 'byte_copy': mess822.c:545:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:545:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c:546:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:546:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c:547:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:547:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c:548:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:548:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c: In function 'byte_copyr': mess822.c:560:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:560:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c:561:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:561:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c:562:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:562:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c:563:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:563:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c: In function 'str_chr': mess822.c:577:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:577:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:578:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:578:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:579:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:579:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:580:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:580:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c: In function 'str_rchr': mess822.c:597:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:597:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:598:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:598:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:599:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:599:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:600:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:600:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ --- msgstore.Sr --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -DXP_MT -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c msgstore.c -o msgstore.Sr --- spamtest_util.Sr --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -DXP_MT -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c spamtest_util.c -o spamtest_util.Sr spamtest_util.c: In function 'glue_actions': spamtest_util.c:309:6: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if(ms->rcpts) ^~ spamtest_util.c:312:10: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' for(j=0;jaction_count;j++) ^~~ --- heap.Sr --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -DXP_MT -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c heap.c -o heap.Sr --- spamtest.Sr --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -DXP_MT -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c spamtest.c -o spamtest.Sr spamtest.c: In function 'read_attribute': spamtest.c:595:24: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'check_string' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(st->attr_buf, st->rb_ptr); ~~^~~~~~~~~~ spamtest.c:545:14: note: expected 'char *' but argument is of type 'unsigned char *' static char *check_string(char *ptr,int len) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ spamtest.c:595:7: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'char *' to 'unsigned char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(st->attr_buf, st->rb_ptr); ^ spamtest.c:601:11: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'unsigned char *' to 'char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] *aval = p + 1; ^ spamtest.c:603:38: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'strlen' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] st->rb_ptr, strlen(st->attr_buf) + 1, ~~^~~~~~~~~~ In file included from spamtest.c:15: /usr/include/string.h:110:9: note: expected 'const char *' but argument is of type 'unsigned char *' size_t strlen(const char *) __pure; ^~~~~~ spamtest.c:605:24: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'check_string' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(p + 1, st->rb_ptr - (p + 1 - st->attr_buf)); ~~^~~ spamtest.c:545:14: note: expected 'char *' but argument is of type 'unsigned char *' static char *check_string(char *ptr,int len) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ spamtest.c:605:7: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'char *' to 'unsigned char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(p + 1, st->rb_ptr - (p + 1 - st->attr_buf)); ^ spamtest.c:612:12: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'unsigned char *' to 'char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] *aname = st->attr_buf; ^ spamtest.c: In function 'read_processed_messages': spamtest.c:1199:48: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'rec_get' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] while ((count > 0) && ((type = rec_get(s, s->record_buf, MAX_RECORD_LEN, &gotln)) > 0) ) ~^~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from spamtest.c:76: record2.h:13:9: note: expected 'unsigned char *' but argument is of type 'char *' int rec_get(spamtest_session_t *s, unsigned char *buf, int maxsize,int *gotlen); ^~~~~~~ --- bufio.Sr --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -DXP_MT -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c bufio.c -o bufio.Sr --- record2.Sr --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -DXP_MT -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c record2.c -o record2.Sr record2.c: In function 'rec_get': record2.c:139:10: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'unsigned char *' to 'char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] bufp = buf; ^ --- mess822.Sr --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -DXP_MT -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c mess822.c -o mess822.Sr --- addrlist.Sr --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -fpic -DPIC -DXP_MT -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -c addrlist.c -o addrlist.Sr --- msgstore.o --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -c msgstore.c --- mess822.Sr --- mess822.c: In function 'byte_chr': mess822.c:509:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:509:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:510:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:510:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:511:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:511:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:512:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:512:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c: In function 'byte_rchr': mess822.c:531:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:531:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:532:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:532:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:533:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:533:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:534:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:534:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c: In function 'byte_copy': mess822.c:545:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:545:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c:546:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:546:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c:547:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:547:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c:548:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:548:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c: In function 'byte_copyr': mess822.c:560:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:560:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c:561:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:561:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c:562:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:562:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c:563:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:563:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c: In function 'str_chr': mess822.c:577:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:577:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:578:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:578:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:579:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:579:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:580:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:580:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c: In function 'str_rchr': mess822.c:597:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:597:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:598:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:598:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:599:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:599:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:600:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:600:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ --- spamtest_util.o --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -c spamtest_util.c --- heap.o --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -c heap.c --- spamtest_util.o --- spamtest_util.c: In function 'glue_actions': spamtest_util.c:309:6: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if(ms->rcpts) ^~ spamtest_util.c:312:10: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' for(j=0;jaction_count;j++) ^~~ --- spamtest.o --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -c spamtest.c spamtest.c: In function 'read_attribute': spamtest.c:595:24: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'check_string' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(st->attr_buf, st->rb_ptr); ~~^~~~~~~~~~ spamtest.c:545:14: note: expected 'char *' but argument is of type 'unsigned char *' static char *check_string(char *ptr,int len) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ spamtest.c:595:7: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'char *' to 'unsigned char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(st->attr_buf, st->rb_ptr); ^ spamtest.c:601:11: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'unsigned char *' to 'char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] *aval = p + 1; ^ spamtest.c:603:38: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'strlen' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] st->rb_ptr, strlen(st->attr_buf) + 1, ~~^~~~~~~~~~ In file included from spamtest.c:15: /usr/include/string.h:110:9: note: expected 'const char *' but argument is of type 'unsigned char *' size_t strlen(const char *) __pure; ^~~~~~ spamtest.c:605:24: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'check_string' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(p + 1, st->rb_ptr - (p + 1 - st->attr_buf)); ~~^~~ spamtest.c:545:14: note: expected 'char *' but argument is of type 'unsigned char *' static char *check_string(char *ptr,int len) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ spamtest.c:605:7: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'char *' to 'unsigned char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] p = check_string(p + 1, st->rb_ptr - (p + 1 - st->attr_buf)); ^ spamtest.c:612:12: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'unsigned char *' to 'char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] *aname = st->attr_buf; ^ --- bufio.o --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -c bufio.c --- spamtest.o --- spamtest.c: In function 'read_processed_messages': spamtest.c:1199:48: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'rec_get' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] while ((count > 0) && ((type = rec_get(s, s->record_buf, MAX_RECORD_LEN, &gotln)) > 0) ) ~^~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from spamtest.c:76: record2.h:13:9: note: expected 'unsigned char *' but argument is of type 'char *' int rec_get(spamtest_session_t *s, unsigned char *buf, int maxsize,int *gotlen); ^~~~~~~ --- record2.o --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -c record2.c --- mess822.o --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -c mess822.c --- addrlist.o --- cc -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -DHEAP_ALLOC_ALIGN=4 -DDEFAULT_ALLOC=32768 -c addrlist.c --- libspamtest_r.a --- rm -f libspamtest_r.a --- mess822.o --- mess822.c: In function 'byte_chr': mess822.c:509:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:509:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:510:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:510:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:511:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:511:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:512:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:512:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c: In function 'byte_rchr': mess822.c:531:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:531:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:532:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:532:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:533:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:533:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:534:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c:534:20: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; --n; ^~ mess822.c: In function 'byte_copy': mess822.c:545:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:545:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c:546:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:546:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c:547:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ --- record2.o --- record2.c: In function 'rec_get': record2.c:139:10: warning: pointer targets in assignment from 'unsigned char *' to 'char *' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] bufp = buf; ^ --- mess822.o --- mess822.c:547:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c:548:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^~ mess822.c:548:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *to++ = *from++; --n; ^ mess822.c: In function 'byte_copyr': mess822.c:560:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:560:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ --- libspamtest_r.a --- ar cr libspamtest_r.a msgstore.or spamtest_util.or heap.or spamtest.or bufio.or record2.or mess822.or addrlist.or --- mess822.o --- mess822.c:561:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:561:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c:562:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:562:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c:563:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^~ mess822.c:563:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!n) return; *--to = *--from; --n; ^ mess822.c: In function 'str_chr': mess822.c:577:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:577:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:578:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:578:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:579:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:579:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:580:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:580:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) break; ++t; ^~ mess822.c: In function 'str_rchr': mess822.c:597:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:597:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:598:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:598:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:599:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:599:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:600:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ mess822.c:600:21: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if' if (!*t) break; if (*t == ch) u = t; ++t; ^~ --- libspamtest.so.3 --- rm -f libspamtest.so.3 cc -shared -Wl,-x -o libspamtest.so.3 -Wl,-soname,libspamtest.so.3 `lorder msgstore.So spamtest_util.So heap.So spamtest.So bufio.So record2.So mess822.So addrlist.So | tsort -q` --- libspamtest_r.a --- ranlib libspamtest_r.a --- libspamtest_r.so.3 --- rm -f libspamtest_r.so.3 cc -pthread -shared -Wl,-x -o libspamtest_r.so.3 `lorder msgstore.Sr spamtest_util.Sr heap.Sr spamtest.Sr bufio.Sr record2.Sr mess822.Sr addrlist.Sr | tsort -q` --- libspamtest.a --- rm -f libspamtest.a ar cr libspamtest.a msgstore.o spamtest_util.o heap.o spamtest.o bufio.o record2.o mess822.o addrlist.o ranlib libspamtest.a SUCCEEDED 00:00:02 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: run-depends ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: stage ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===> Staging for libspamtest-20080808 ===> Generating temporary packing list /bin/mkdir -p /construction/mail/libspamtest/stage/usr/local/ap-mailfilter3/lib /construction/mail/libspamtest/stage/usr/local/ap-mailfilter3/include install -m 0644 /construction/mail/libspamtest/libspamtest/libspamtest.a /construction/mail/libspamtest/libspamtest/libspamtest_r.a /construction/mail/libspamtest/stage/usr/local/ap-mailfilter3/lib install -m 0644 /construction/mail/libspamtest/libspamtest/spamtest.h /construction/mail/libspamtest/libspamtest/msgstore.h /construction/mail/libspamtest/stage/usr/local/ap-mailfilter3/include ====> Compressing man pages (compress-man) ====> Running Q/A tests (stage-qa) Warning: You have disabled the licenses framework with DISABLE_LICENSES, unable to run checks SUCCEEDED 00:00:01 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Phase: package ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===> Building package for libspamtest-20080808 file sizes/checksums [4]: 0% file sizes/checksums [4]: 100% packing files [4]: 0% packing files [4]: 100% packing directories [0]: 0% packing directories [0]: 100% SUCCEEDED 00:00:00 TOTAL TIME 00:00:04